🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing group of countries are exploring comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to enact a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged families to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these platforms, the move does not establish binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," stated a leading MEP behind the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong evidence".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration pledged to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material argues that a strict age ban may not protect children and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly unfolding at the state government level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a measure barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some individuals to follow Australia's example, a federal ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Views

Outside of these regions, further nations are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations adopt a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve user protection.

Even as this global debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and its followers show that policymakers around the world are less and less willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.